|
A.D. 2000 will be the sixth year of the Society's
House Martin Survey. We are making some progress in attracting new
recorders but it would still be very worthwhile to have as many more
as possible, to contribute to this HOS survey. To give some idea of
the coverage of the County:- in 1999 we had records from the
following, Andover Down, Bramshill, Buriton, Butlocks Heath*,
Chandlers Ford, Colden Common, East Wellow, Fareham, Farnborough,
Flowerdown, Gosport, Hamble*, Hambledon, Hayling Island, Heckfield,
Hook*, Hythe, Itchen Abbas, Kingsworthy, Leckford, Long Parish,
Lymington*, Newnham, North End (Portsmouth), North Poulner*, Odiham*,
Petersfield, Ringwood*, Riseley, Southampton, Stockbridge*, Stratfield
Turgis, Swanmore, Sway, Wickham, Wood Green. Note, Records for the
communities marked with an asterisk (*) were new in 1999. If your
village, town, locality is not listed do join in the study: we need
you. Please give it a serious 'think'.
For the five year period, 1995-1999, for which we
have consistent data from the same 26 recorders, the nest count
figures are:
|
Site size* |
Recorders |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
|
Larger, >50 nests |
3 |
218 |
235 |
272 |
236 |
222 |
|
Medium, 15-49 nests |
9 |
125 |
118 |
133 |
146 |
130 |
|
Smaller, <15 nests |
14 |
72 |
66 |
51 |
44 |
49 |
|
|
|
415 |
419 |
456 |
426 |
401 |
*The three site size ranges are arbitrary: sites
which fall into the two higher categories have had at least one year
out of the five with either 50 nests or 15 nests.
These figures give some idea of the overall position
in Hampshire, and they suggest that during the last five years there
has neither been a 'crash' nor a consistent increase in House Martin
nest numbers. Clearly the three larger sites are making a major
contribution to the statistics; but equally clearly, the medium sized
and smaller colonies are also significant. Because the overall
coverage of the County is relatively modest, and because we have only
had three larger sites in the survey for the full five years, it is
unrealistic to try to draw any general conclusions from the foregoing
data. There are, however, two other larger sites for which we have
4-year figures, neither is near the other 3 sites: at Site 4 the
numbers fluctuate between 93 and 81 nests, but at Site 5 they have
been rising from 48 to 85. The inconsistency within all the figures
makes it impossible to claim any evident trend for the larger
colonies.
In the case of the medium sized colonies, there has
been no clear tendency. Some, such as the one being monitored in
Newnham (scattered over 6 buildings), seem to have been more or less
stable, some apparently growing and some declining. Again the sample
is too small for valid conclusions to be drawn. And the pattern is
much the same for the smaller colonies, except that the numbers in
three have fallen to nil for the past two years. This need not mean
they will not recover, because there is one instance of a zero return
in 1998 followed by a 10-nest count in 1999. It is worth re-stating
that nil returns, from sites which have been occupied in former years,
continue to be valuable for this study, please continue to send them
in.
The Survey, besides giving a great deal of valuable
data about the County's House Martin nest numbers, has thrown up some
other interesting observations. For example, a nestling predator which
has been reported (from Andover Down and Kilmeston) is the Greater
Spotted Woodpecker. Such activity is recorded in The Handbook of
British Birds, and these birds' habit of attacking nest boxes is also
well attested. And in 1998 there was a case of Magpies stretching down
from a gutter above an artificial House Martin nesting box and
extracting the young birds. The householder countered this by fixing a
board above the nesting box and beyond the eaves so that the Magpies
cannot now reach their prey.
One observer knows of a House Martin nest positioned
so far under the eaves that it might be mistaken for a Swift's nest,
(but the parent and later the young were ringed and their identity
cannot be doubted).
Another recorder has found that when there is
choice, House Martins tend to build on white rendered or painted walls
rather then other surfaces. It would be instructive to know if other
respondents confirm this observation. A fairly general observation is
that House Martins seem to be returning to their nest sites later than
in former years, and one observer wondered whether the birds had
perhaps already raised one brood elsewhere, en route. A householder
with several nests noted, in 1998, that a great many young birds
seemed to have left their nests too soon (before they could fly) and
were found to be heavily parasitized by ticks. They did not survive.
Another observation, is that in late summer, parties of House Martins
apparently 'visit' existing nests or uncolonised, potential nest sites
in a neighbourhood: are they young birds becoming familiar with the
area and seeking somewhere to nest when they return in spring? All
these additional points, submitted by recorders, add to our stock of
knowledge about House Martins in Hampshire; they are included here
because of their intrinsic interest and in the hope they may prompt
other participants in this HOS Survey to add their own experiences.
House Martin Survey 2000
(A guide for new recorders and an aide memoire for
established reporters)
1. Observers are asked to visit every site within
their chosen area where House Martins nest, or may be nesting, between
mid-July and end-August.
2. Only nests that have been active during the year
should be recorded; just note those nests which have a good volume of
the current year's droppings below them, or nests which are obviously
occupied (it is often possible to check the occupied nests by
'calling' the occupants - adults or nestlings - by making a squeaking
sound from below the nests).
3. Please omit incomplete nests, broken nests or
nests which have been used by other birds, such as house sparrows or
wrens (these can often be identified by pieces of grass, feathers,
moss, protruding from the entrance hole).
4. Finally send the data to me using the form below.
It is important to give a 6-figure grid reference or in some other way
to pin-point the location of the nests or colonies.
5. If you have a problem defining what a colony
consists of, or any other query about this House Martin Survey, please
write to Nigel Bell at the address below. I am sure the difficulty can
be ironed out.
Please send your observations, before 1st October
2000, to: Nigel Bell, Ashmead, Newnham, Hook, Hants. RG27 9AF. (01256
762 104)
|